Go into the dubious methods of scientific publications

Go into the dubious methods of scientific publications

Lab life. Hydroxychloroquine had at least one effect. The controversy over the treatment of Kovid-19 has prompted a handful of researchers to examine the skeptical methods of the scientific publishing world. Clara Loccher and Florian Nadet (Rennes University Hospital), David Mohr (University of Ottawa, Canada), Iona Christia (University of Pavia, Italy) in July 2020 Made a strange observation About Hydroxychloroquine Promoter Didier Rault. 32% of the 728 articles in this microbiologist’s journal are co – authored New microbes and new infections. The editor and six other members of the editorial board worked with him. These authors have co-authored 44% of the articles in the journal … Is there any bias in this journal?

Regardless, the British psychologist Dorothy Bishop Pinned to his blog Mark Griffiths is another prolific author from Nottingham Trent University (UK) who published 90 papers in 2019. In addition, he has authored 13% of essays. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, On the editorial board where he sits. Are these dubious practices very popular?

To get to the bottom of it, the first researchers teamed up with Alexander Scanf, a British psychologist and a medical intern from Rennes. The title of their article was pre-printed BioRxiv February 3 And review for peer review and there is no doubt about their conclusion. There will be a lot of newspapers “Nepotics”, To qualify their potential practices as guardianship.

An author can co-sign 10% of the articles in a publication

Researchers have defined a number of parameters to detect suspicious logs here. “These indicators should be seen as warning signals about dubious editorial actions. But a more in-depth analysis, especially by studying the quality of the articles, confirms that. “, Clara Loccher explains. Between 2015 and 2019, the team analyzed 4,986,335 articles from 5,468 journals in the biomedical field. In more than 250 of these journals, or 5% of the sample, the same author co-authored at least 10% of the articles in the publication.

See also  SpaceX's SN9 starship prototype launches engine for the first time
The article is reserved for our subscribers Read this too “Lancetgate”: Publishing a lot in scientific journals will yield great results

Where possible, the researchers extracted the time between submitting an article and receiving it in the journal, i.e. the length of the specialist review process, Peer Review. For 10% of newspapers, a prolific writer publishes half of his articles within three weeks, while for other writers it often takes months. “Favorite allows you to post more, and faster”, Florian emphasizes nad debt.

You have 32.12% left to read this article. The rest is for subscribers only.

Written By
More from Jake Pearson
Cao Yuan is 25 years old, and today’s the eighth nature-people-cnBeta.COM
Cao Yuan, Nature posted again! You have heard that right, the eighth...
Read More
Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *